Skip to content

Brewing Control: the Case of Super Bock

Seppe Maes, Caroline Buts, Marc Jegers

DOI https://doi.org/10.21552/core/2023/3/11

Keywords: resale price maintenance, RPM, vertical restraints, distribution agreements, by object


Annotation on the Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 29 June 2023 in Case C-211/22 Super Bock Bebidas SA and Others v Autoridade da Concorrência
In its judgment of 29 June 2023, following six questions referred for a preliminary ruling, the Court of Justice of the EU provided clarity in dealing with a vertical case involving resale price maintenance (RPM).1 A topic that had already undergone considerable evolution in existing case law, from a phenomenon that was considered as restrictive by object, following among others the Binon case, to a much more nuanced view in which the Court noted that the agreements should be assessed in their appropriate legal and economic context where the restrictive effect should be established first.

Seppe Maes is a PhD student at the Department of Applied Economics of the Vrije Universiteit Brussel. Caroline Buts and Marc Jegers are both professor at the Department of Applied Economics of the Vrije Universiteit Brussel. E-mail addresses: seppe.maes@vub.be (S. Maes), caroline.buts@vub.be (C. Buts), marc.jegers@vub.be (M. Jegers).

Share


Lx-Number Search

A
|
(e.g. A | 000123 | 01)

Export Citation