Implementation of the ECN+ Directive ∙ Cyprus: Draft Bill Setting the Foundations for a New Era of Competition Law Enforcement? journal article Eleana Poulladou European Competition and Regulatory Law Review, Volume 5 (2021), Issue 3, Page 230 - 233
Implementation of the ECN+ Directive ∙ Denmark: Introduction of Civil Fines and Allignment of Procedures journal article Erik Kjær-Hansen European Competition and Regulatory Law Review, Volume 5 (2021), Issue 3, Page 239 - 242
Implementation of the ECN+ Directive ∙ Malta: The Journey Towards Effective Enforcement - Where Does Malta Stand? journal article Sylvann Aquilina Zahra European Competition and Regulatory Law Review, Volume 5 (2021), Issue 3, Page 287 - 293
Implementation of the ECN+ Directive ∙ Luxembourg: A New Competition Law And Institutional Framework journal article Lena Hornkohl European Competition and Regulatory Law Review, Volume 5 (2021), Issue 3, Page 280 - 286
Implementation of the ECN+ Directive ∙ Lithuania: Investigative and Sanctioning Powers of the Lithuanian Competition Council - Making a Strong NCA journal article Rita Paukštė European Competition and Regulatory Law Review, Volume 5 (2021), Issue 3, Page 276 - 279
Lithuania ∙ 2019 in Review: Enforcement and Sanctioning Trends in Antitrust journal article Rita Paukštė European Competition and Regulatory Law Review, Volume 4 (2020), Issue 3, Page 205 - 209
Corona and EU Economic Law: journal article open-access Competition and Free Movement in Times of Crisis Friso Bostoen, Nina Colpaert, Wouter Devroe, Joris Gruyters, Lennard Michaux, Liesbet Van Acker European Competition and Regulatory Law Review, Volume 4 (2020), Issue 2, Page 72 - 95 The outbreak of the coronavirus—and the responses of governments and businesses to combat the medical and economic crisis it entails—raise a number of urgent questions, many of which concern European economic law, ie the competition rules and free movement provisions. Can businesses cooperate to guarantee the supply of essential items or a vaccine notwithstanding the cartel prohibition of Article 101 TFEU? Is the excessive price doctrine of Article 102 TFEU a match for the price increases caused by hoarding behaviour? Can competition authorities continue to assess mergers, and might they even become more sympathetic to certain arguments such as the failing firm defence and industrial policy considerations? Under which conditions are Member States allowed to grant aid to undertakings that face economic difficulties due to the crisis? Can Member States prohibit the export of medical supplies to other Member States, and can they close their borders for European citizens? And how much freedom do public procurement rules leave governments to quickly conclude contracts for essential supplies? This article addresses these pressing questions in a comprehensive manner. It situates the numerous guidance documents adopted by the European Commission within the broader framework of EU economic law and then evaluates the compatibility of the public and private corona-related measures with that framework. The aim is to offer a legal guide for governments and businesses combatting the corona crisis. Keywords: corona; EU economic law; competition law; internal market law; public procurement
Romania ∙ More on Regulation, Market Screening, Antitrust Enforcement and Future Policy Contributions journal article Bogdan Marius Chirițoiu, Vlad Dan Roman European Competition and Regulatory Law Review, Volume 4 (2020), Issue 4, Page 309 - 313
Infineon Technologies AG v Commission: A Referral from the Court of Justice on Proportionality Grounds (T-758/14 RENV Infineon Technologies v Commission) journal article Niccolò Colombo, Alejandra Garcia Hoyos European Competition and Regulatory Law Review, Volume 4 (2020), Issue 4, Page 328 - 332 Case T-758/14 RENV Infineon Technologies v Commission, Judgment of the General Court of 8 July 2020 Following a referral from the Court of Justice, the General Court, in exercising its unlimited jurisdiction, held that the Commission did not take sufficient account of the individual participation of Infineon in the single overall agreement and reduced the fine by an additional 5% on account of mitigating circumstances.
The Netherlands ∙ A Competition Law On Our Planet journal article Tim Raats European Competition and Regulatory Law Review, Volume 4 (2020), Issue 4, Page 300 - 304
Theories of Harm in the Implementation of the Foreign Subsidies Regulation Adina Claici, Peter Davis, Gerhard Dijkstra